AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 17 for citations:"86 F.3d 1178".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • next »
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Lillie M. BODDIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 21, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Karl H. HANSSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 13, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Robert PECINA, Sr., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Carol L. OWINGS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 16, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Al MUNFORD, Inc. d/b/a Munford Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 1996
86 F.3d 1178; 40 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Gilbert D. CLARK, individually and derivatively on behalf of the Holland Company, Inc of the Carolinas and Holland Distributors, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The B.H. HOLLAND COMPANY, INC., the Holland Company, Inc. of the Carolinas, Holland Distributors, Inc., the Holland Company, Inc., Robert B. Holland and Charles Powers, Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. In re Jeffrey J. VANDERBILT, James H. Glover and Horst K. Seeger.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 16, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. THOMAS EQUIPMENT LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Paul G. HOLBROOK, Claimant-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 17, 1996
86 F.3d 1178
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.