AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 15 for citations:"57 F.3d 1084".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • next »
Joe-Riley EPPS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 9, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Emogene S. BERRY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 8, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Severin J. DISCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 8, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Debra K. MALLORY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Janice J. NEIDIG, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 16, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Jose M. MENCHACA, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
July 5, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
John A. HAYES, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 7, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Candace R. SHULTIS, Personal Representative of David R. Elwing (Deceased). Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 8, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Renee P. MORIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 8, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
Michele M. MIGLETZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 12, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. AB-TECH CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Cross/Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 8, 1995
57 F.3d 1084
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.