AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 2 of 2 for citations:"433 F.2d 174".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
UNITED STATES of America v. AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY CORPORATION, Kohler Co., Crane Co., Wallace-Murray Corporation, Universal-Rundle Corporation, Rheem ManufacturingCompany, Borg-Warner Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, PlumbingFixtureManufacturers Association, Joseph J. Decker, Daniel J. Quinn, Norman R. Held,Robert E. Casner, John B. Balmer, Stanley S. Backner, Robert J. Pierson, Jr.,and George W. Kelch. Appeal of AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., in No. 18182. Appeal of KOHLER COMPANY, in No. 18183. Appeal of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, in No. 18184. Appeal of Joseph J. DECKER, in No. 18185. Appeal Of Daniel J. QUINN, in No. 18186. Appeal of Norman R. HELD, in No. 18187.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
November 3, 1970
1970 Trade Cases P 73; 433 F.2d 174
UNITED STATES of America v. AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY CORPORATION, Kohler Co., Crane Co., Wallace-Murray Corporation, Universal-Rundle Corporation, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Borg-Warner Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, Plumbing Fixture Manufacturers Association, Joseph J. Decker, Daniel J. Quinn, Norman R. Held, Robert E. Casner, John B. Balmer, Stanley S. Backner, Robert J. Pierson, Jr., and George W. Kelch. Appeal of AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., in No. 18182. Appeal of KOHLER COMPANY, in No. 18183. Appeal of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, in No. 18184. Appeal of Joseph J. DECKER, in No. 18185. Appeal of Daniel J. QUINN, in No. 18186. Appeal of Norman R. HELD, in No. 18187.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
November 3, 1970
433 F.2d 174

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.