AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 2 of 2 for citations:"342 F.2d 167".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
The UNITED STATES of America, the Honorable Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General of the United States, and the Honorable Robert E. Hauberg, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, Petitioners, v. Honorable W. Harold COX, United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Respondent. The Honorable Robert E. HAUBERG, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, and the Honorable Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Appellants, v. Honorable W. Harold COX, United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
June 1, 1965
342 F.2d 167
The UNITED STATES of America, the Honorable Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General of the United States, and the Honorable Robert E. Hauberg, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, Petitioners, v. Honorable W. Harold COX, United States District Judge of the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Respondent. The Honorable Robert E. HAUBERG, United States Attorney for the SouthernDistrict of Mississippi, and the Honorable Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, ActingAttorney General of the United States, Appellants, v. Honorable W. Harold COX, United States District Judge of the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
June 1, 1965
342 F.2d 167

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.