AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 34 for citations:"111 F.3d 139".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next »
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Barbara WARREN, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Gregory Warren; Leona Warren, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; Brian Alexander De Becker, individually and in official capacity; Steve Wayne Borden, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 15, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallace Ward PAYNE, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 21, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Ryan SASS, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 8, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Jay RUTGARD, Defendant, Linda J. Rutgard, Third Party Petitioner to Forfeited Assets, third-party-petitioner Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 9, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 15, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 8, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John M. WOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 15, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paulette VANDENBOSCH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP CORPORATION, An Erisa Plan; Travelers Insurance Company; Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 9, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 10, 1997
111 F.3d 139
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Ernesto VILLABONA-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 22, 1997
111 F.3d 139
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.