AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 31 for citations:"107 F.3d 4".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next »
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jacob COHEN, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 20, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Feliks SADOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TECHNICAL CAREER INSTITUTES, INC.; and Does I, II, III, IV, and V, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 12, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Wilson TAVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 12, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Maurice A. RAPOPORT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANCO MEXICANO SOMEX, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
January 10, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Ronnie SLEDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Emery B. GUEST, Sheriff, individually and in his official capacities as Sheriff for Tompkins County, New York, and John Doe, individually and in his official capacities as Food Services Manager for Tompkins County Jail, New York, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
December 30, 1996
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. REN-CRIS LITHO, INC., d/b/a Printing Products, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANTAGE GRAPHICS, INC.; Elliot Passo; Samuel Hunter, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 24, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stephen ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
January 29, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Justo RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rev. Dr. Earl B. MOORE, Assistant Commissioner, Ministerial and Family Services, James Festa, Family Reunion Coordinator, Auburn Correctional Facility, Shirley R. Baker, Regional Coordinator, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 21, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. RED BALL INTERIOR DEMOLITION CORP. and John Palmadessa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel PALMADESSA, Donald Palmadessa, William Palmadessa, Supreme Recycling, Inc., and Fortune Interior Dismantling Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
February 3, 1997
107 F.3d 4
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. S & S TOBACCO & CANDY CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. STOP & SHOP COMPANIES, INC.; Stop & Shop Supermarket Holdings Co., Inc.; Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.; Stop & Shop Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
January 30, 1997
107 F.3d 4
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.